• Importance of Peer Reviewing
    • Peer review is an essential part of formal scholarly communication and lies at the heart of the scientific method. Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer Reviewers need to recognize the importance of their role and commit to contributing high-quality work to the process of publishing scholarly research.
  • Promptness
    • Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a paper, or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse themselves from the review process. If a selected referee agrees to review a paper, they should then adhere to timelines set by the editor.
  • Confidentiality
    • Any papers for review must be treated with strict confidentiality. The papers must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  • Standards of Objectivity
    • Reviews should be objective, devoid of personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  • Study Ethics
    • Reviewers are encouraged to comment on ethical questions and possible research misconduct raised by submissions (e.g. unethical research design, insufficient detail on patient consent or protection of research subjects, including animals).
  • Acknowledgment of Sources
    • Reviewers are encouraged to be alert to redundant publication and plagiarism. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.